









|

Engineering Design is a Decision-making Process
Sundar Krishnamurty
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
University of Massachusetts-Amherst
NSF Open Workshop on Decision Based Design
13-14 September 1997
Engineering design is essentially a part of the product
realization process by which new or modified products are conceived,
developed, designed, manufactured, and brought to market. It then
becomes apparent that design engineers must be knowledgeable about
and competent to contribute, not just to one aspect of design
or design based primarily on the principles of engineering science,
but also to the series of decisions and their consequences associated
with the entire product realization process. As such, engineering
design is essentially a decision making process that requires
rigorous evaluation and comparison of design alternatives from
a global perspective on the basis of different classes of design
criteria.
Therefore, engineering design should stress a fundamental
and scientific understanding of design based on the entire product
realization process. The research agenda for engineering design
should address all aspects of design including modeling, configuration
and parametric design, design for manufacturing, and material
selection. Issues such as tolerances and uncertainty in data need
to be accounted for in some manner. Design strategies must be
devised to specifically address the inherent complexity arising
from representing physical design problems using idealized computer-based
abstractions (computer models). In addition, the research agenda
should also focus on the strategic integration of these different
design stages. Such a research agenda can then lead to the identification
and development of a consistent and recognized body of design
principles with vital and respected research components that will
play a crucial role in enabling engineers make intelligent decisions
towards improving the overall quality of the products designed. Currently, our research group is working towards establishing such a rigorous framework for decision making in the context of engineering design by exploring concepts from
multiattribute utility theory and through its integration with
statistical exploration based robust optimal design strategies.
Our goal is to develop a sound, practical trade-off based robust
modeling and design methodology to quantitatively incorporate
qualitative knowledge and preferences of multiple, conflicting
attributes without loss of generality and accuracy under conditions
of risk and uncertainty. We expect the results from this research
to advance the state of knowledge by which decisions can be made
in engineering design and to lead to a better understanding of
the consequences of such design decisions from an overall perspective.

|
|